The Turkish Parliament recently approved the Judiciary Package, known as the “9th Judicial Package,” bringing about amendments to various laws and regulations. One notable change in the proposal was the removal of the controversial last name regulation concerning married women. This decision has sparked discussions and debates among the public, as it directly impacts the rights and identities of women in Turkey.
Background of the Judiciary Package
The Judiciary Package has been a topic of interest for a significant period, with discussions revolving around various legal reforms and amendments. The proposal aimed to address several key issues within the Turkish legal system, including changes to the Civil Code and other relevant laws. However, one of the most contentious topics within the package was the regulation concerning the last names of married women.
Removal of Last Name Regulation
The removal of the last name regulation from the Judiciary Package has garnered mixed reactions from different segments of society. Under the current Turkish Civil Code, when a woman gets married, she traditionally adopts her husband’s last name. However, there is also a provision that allows women to retain their maiden name alongside their husband’s surname by submitting a request to the civil registry office.
The proposed regulation that was removed from the package would have restricted women from using their maiden name independently after marriage. This restriction raised concerns among women’s rights activists and advocates for gender equality, who argued that it would limit women’s autonomy and personal choices regarding their identities.
Implications and Reactions
The decision to remove the last name regulation has been met with both support and criticism from various quarters. Advocates for women’s rights have welcomed the move, seeing it as a step towards preserving women’s autonomy and freedom of choice. On the other hand, some conservative groups and individuals have expressed disappointment over the decision, citing traditional values and societal norms.
The debate surrounding the last name regulation reflects broader discussions on gender equality and women’s rights in Turkey. While the country has made significant progress in promoting gender equality in recent years, there are still areas where women face challenges and restrictions based on traditional norms and practices.
In conclusion, the removal of the last name regulation from the Judiciary Package represents a victory for women’s rights and autonomy in Turkey. However, it also highlights the ongoing debates and struggles for gender equality and empowerment in the country. As discussions continue, it is essential to consider the diverse perspectives and voices of women in shaping policies and laws that impact their lives and identities.
